We’re very excited to be able to move much of the work of this committee into our new intern’s assignment. Since we’ve had low in person attendance, stay tuned for a new group where we can discuss these issues online at a pace that works for everyone.
Today’s meeting will be a general catch up session. Looking forward to reviewing our accomplishments and determining what comes next!
Due to conflicts etc, Tonight’s Racial Equity Committee meeting will change location back to 700 Clancy Ave NE and consist of watching a Human Rights Cities webinar. We will resume work on the same pattern as planned, repeating the housing work session at our first July meeting.
We completed the housing portion of our power analysis (first three photos) as well as an overview of what the power analysis is (fourth photo).
We discussed the City’s proposed Human Rights Ordinance and noted we needed to add housing to our list of power analysis areas. As we recapped that concept, disparate impact and disproportionality surfaced as the actual impact while the result can become a human rights report. Pittsburgh recently published 80 equity indicators which were grouped into 4 of the categories we intend to consider. We talked a bit about what’s been going on in the south side of town, food deserts, etc. Elianna will email the committee to identify the top 3 categories to tackle first (also brainstorming by email) as well as to address community relations tasks. Our next in-person meeting will be May 22.
The first CRRE committee meeting on April 3rd introduced a variety of concepts, including changing systems that hold power to create equitable outcomes, service providers acting as gatekeepers, disaggregating data to show disproportionate impact (examples of low business ownership and high suspensions and expulsions among communities of color), and organizations’ propensity focus on optics as opposed to change. We outlined 8 areas of impact to discuss in our power analysis: health, education, criminal justice, environment, health/social services, economics, culture/religion, and communication. Raven from GRAAHI noted they have a health equity index and will be doing in person and online surveys before forming a health workgroup. We listed categories of organization that impact communities generally and named some specific to Belknap. We noted data sources, strategies to pursue to seek influence, local geographic divides, and the importance of making our findings accessible and replicable with a dashboard.